Dr. Godknows Igali’s perspective on the exit of some Sahelian countries (Niger, Burkina Faso, and Mali) from ECOWAS highlights several key points, particularly the sovereign rights of nations to make decisions about their alliances. He emphasizes that no country can be forced to be part of an organization it does not wish to join, underscoring that these countries’ decision to exit ECOWAS is within their rights.
Igali also touches on the idea that ECOWAS has historically allowed for micro-relationships and smaller associations among countries. He provides an example of a collaboration between Nigeria, Ghana, and Togo, called the Co-Prosperity Zone, which existed alongside ECOWAS without interfering with the broader regional framework. This shows that smaller unions or informal arrangements within ECOWAS have been acceptable in the past.
The implication for the sub-region and the continent as a whole is likely to be a mixed one. While these countries’ exit reflects their desire for autonomy in shaping their foreign relations, it could challenge the unity and effectiveness of ECOWAS, especially in dealing with shared regional issues. However, the flexibility within ECOWAS could allow for these micro-alliances to continue existing and functioning without completely destabilizing the broader regional organization.
In essence, Igali seems to suggest that this exit does not necessarily undermine ECOWAS, but may bring a shift in how smaller unions and bilateral relationships within the region evolve.
