< 1 mn read
This development—if confirmed—marks a potentially significant shift in the Ukraine conflict’s diplomatic trajectory. Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, suggesting that Putin is open to a “permanent peace” could signal Moscow’s interest in redefining its position, at least rhetorically. However, a few key points stand out:
- Skepticism Warranted: While the language used—”permanent peace,” “compelling meeting”—is optimistic, Putin’s track record and Russia’s previous negotiating tactics often include strategic pauses or diplomatic overtures that do not translate into actual de-escalation. The lack of concrete concessions and the conditionality of a Black Sea truce reinforce this skepticism.
- Business Angle: Witkoff’s mention of commercial opportunities as part of the negotiations is interesting. It suggests that economic incentives—perhaps involving energy or sanctions relief—are being weighed alongside political agreements. That could create new leverage or, conversely, open the door to criticism that U.S. policy is being influenced by business interests.
- Trump’s Role: Trump’s direct push for progress, including urging Moscow to “get moving,” aligns with his past approach of personalized diplomacy. But it also raises questions about how aligned this strategy is with broader NATO and EU policies, especially if it leads to zones of control or other controversial compromises.
- Timing and Credibility: This is reportedly the third meeting since Trump returned to office in January, implying some continuity and effort behind the scenes. Yet without Ukrainian buy-in or verified steps from Russia (like withdrawal, ceasefire implementation, or prisoner exchanges), it’s hard to say if this is real movement or just diplomatic theater.
Would you like a breakdown of how this could potentially impact NATO relations or the 2025 U.S. foreign policy landscape?