< 1 mn read
There was a significant disruption during the Senate plenary involving Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. The issue stemmed from her seat being changed without her consent, which she strongly objected to. The situation escalated when the Chief Whip raised a point of order, and the senator expressed her displeasure loudly, demanding an explanation for the change. Eventually, the situation was brought under control after the Senate President tried to intervene, though the use of the public address system was halted in the process.
It sounds like a tense moment. Do you have thoughts on how these kinds of disagreements should be handled in legislative settings?
