Nigeria’s Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, has denied allegations of sexual harassment made against him by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. Speaking on Wednesday during the Senate’s resumption of plenary after a week’s recess, Akpabio dismissed the accusations, asserting, “At no time did I ever harass any woman,” and emphasized that he had been raised by his late single mother to always uphold respect for women. He also pointed out that he was recognized as the most gender-friendly governor in Nigeria.

However, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan immediately raised a petition under Order 40, accusing Akpabio of sexual harassment and abuse of office. She sought permission to formally present the petition before the Senate, which was subsequently referred to the Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Code of Conduct for review.

This matter has sparked significant attention within the Senate, with both parties involved maintaining their positions. The committee is expected to investigate the allegations as soon as possible, with further developments likely to unfold in the coming days.

The trial of 40 prominent opposition figures in Tunisia, including politicians, lawyers, media personalities, and business leaders, began on Tuesday amid growing tensions and controversy. The accused are facing charges of conspiring against state security, with many detainees absent from the court due to remote proceedings, which have been criticized by defense lawyers and activists as a violation of fair trial standards. Only those released on bail attended the trial in person, while families of the detainees and protesters gathered outside the courthouse, calling for transparency and demanding the physical presence of all accused.

The trial has polarized the country. Some Tunisians, like Mohamed, a fish vendor, voiced support for the government’s actions, blaming the opposition figures for the country’s economic crisis. This sentiment reflects broader frustration with Tunisia’s severe economic hardship, including soaring inflation and widespread unemployment. Mohamed expressed hope for severe punishments for the accused, attributing the nation’s struggles to their actions.

However, a significant portion of the population, including human rights organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, has condemned the trial as part of a wider effort by President Kais Saied’s government to silence dissent. Saied, who has faced criticism for his increasingly authoritarian stance, argues that the crackdown on opposition figures is necessary to combat corruption and stabilize Tunisia’s economy. His supporters view the measures as essential to addressing the country’s deepening crisis.

Protests outside the courthouse and throughout Tunisia have been loud and persistent. Many citizens, such as Lamia Farhani, a member of the Defense Committee for the detainees, have decried the trial’s lack of fairness, emphasizing the irony of a constitutional law expert—Saied—violating the very laws he swore to uphold. Farhani and others are calling for the detainees to be allowed to face their accusers directly in court, arguing that the remote proceedings undermine the legitimacy of the trial.

The trial’s unfolding is watched closely by international observers, who fear it could further erode Tunisia’s democracy. Since Saied’s controversial power grab in 2021, when he suspended parliament and assumed rule by decree, Tunisia’s democratic institutions have steadily weakened. Analysts warn that the outcome of this trial could have lasting repercussions for the nation’s political future.

Despite mounting criticism and concern over the trial’s transparency, the government remains firm in its stance, and protests in support of the detainees are expected to continue. With tensions running high, Tunisia’s democratic trajectory hangs in the balance, and the trial is set to play a pivotal role in shaping the country’s future political landscape.

The political crisis in Guinea-Bissau has escalated after a delegation from the West African regional bloc, ECOWAS, was expelled by President Umaro Sissoco Embalo. The ECOWAS mission, which had been sent to resolve the crisis, was forced to depart on Monday after facing threats of expulsion from Embalo. This comes after Embalo’s announcement at the airport in Bissau, where he confirmed that he would run for a second term as president in the upcoming elections scheduled for November 30.

Embalo’s decision to run for re-election is contentious, with the opposition arguing that his first term already ended on February 27, 2025, as per Guinea-Bissau’s constitution. The opposition claims that Embalo’s tenure was supposed to conclude at the end of February, but the Supreme Court ruled that his first term should run until September 4, 2025. This situation has further intensified the political tensions, with opposition leaders demanding his resignation and planning mass protests and strikes.

Embalo’s announcement comes after his administration survived two coup attempts, the most recent of which occurred in December 2023. Following this incident, Embalo dissolved the opposition-controlled parliament, accusing it of passivity in the face of ongoing political instability.

Meanwhile, Embalo has been strengthening international ties, notably with Russia, having recently met with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss potential economic and security partnerships. This growing relationship with Russia signals a shift in Guinea-Bissau’s international alliances, as Russia has become a preferred security partner for several African nations, reducing the influence of traditional powers like France and the United States.

As tensions continue to rise, the situation in Guinea-Bissau remains precarious, with the opposition vowing to take action against Embalo’s extended presidency while the president appears determined to stay in power until the elections.

The Presbyterian Church of Nigeria (PCN) in Calabar has responded to reports of an 80-year-old man’s body being discovered near one of its church premises, denying that the remains were found within or around their property. According to the church’s Director of Information, Rev. Nnoke Ibe, their investigations show the body was found near a power transformer along Eyamba Street, which is a significant distance away from the Eyamba Parish Presbyterian Church in Calabar South.

Despite the denial, local residents have expressed concern over the discovery, noting that the deceased was not known in the area and no family members have come forward to claim the body. The PCN has urged government authorities to investigate the situation and take swift action to remove the body, as its decomposition could pose a health risk to the surrounding community.

This incident has raised concerns among the residents and local authorities, highlighting the importance of community safety and the need for proper handling of such situations.

The new guidelines for the quarterly Stakeholder and Citizens’ Engagement Meetings outlined by the Presidency signify a significant step toward enhancing transparency, inclusivity, and citizen participation in governance. By mandating ministries to hold regular, structured engagements with the public, the government is aiming to bridge the gap between the citizens and the administration, which can build trust and foster greater collaboration.

The requirement for each ministry to hold at least one engagement meeting every quarter, with ministers and top officials actively participating, shows the seriousness with which the government is approaching public communication. This could be a game-changer in how the government interacts with the public, ensuring that citizens not only hear about policies but also have the opportunity to provide feedback that could influence future decisions.

The focus on inclusivity is also notable. Inviting civil society organizations, professional groups, media outlets, and ordinary citizens ensures that a wide cross-section of society is involved in the process. The emphasis on media coverage, especially through both traditional and online platforms, will likely maximize awareness and encourage broader participation.

Furthermore, the requirement for ministers and ministry officials to respond to concerns and provide evidence of how public feedback is incorporated into policy decisions is essential for ensuring that these engagements are more than just symbolic. It will allow citizens to see the tangible impact of their input and hold the government accountable.

By clearly differentiating between genuine stakeholder engagement and other public appearances (such as interviews or speeches without stakeholder involvement), the guidelines aim to create a more meaningful dialogue between the government and the people. This will likely make these meetings more valuable, as they are designed to be participatory rather than one-sided.

The comprehensive documentation requirements—such as submitting attendance lists, presentations, and feedback implementation reports—are also crucial for maintaining transparency and accountability.

These new guidelines seem to be a step in the right direction for a more transparent and responsive government. The success of this initiative will depend largely on how well the ministries execute these engagements and whether they can effectively incorporate feedback into decision-making processes.

What do you think about these new guidelines? Do you believe they will lead to a more transparent and inclusive government, or do you think there could be challenges in implementing them?

Governor Bassey Otu’s decision to revoke the concession agreement with CIBA Construction Company Limited regarding the management of Obudu Cattle Ranch marks a significant shift in the state’s approach to the management of one of its iconic tourism sites. The termination stems from CIBA’s repeated material breaches of the agreement, including their failure to renovate the resort’s hotel and maintain other critical components. Despite multiple opportunities to remedy these issues, the company failed to meet its obligations, leading to the state’s decision to take action.

This move by the Cross River State government reflects a desire to restore the resort to its former glory, especially considering the historical significance of the Obudu Cattle Ranch, which was once a major tourist attraction under the leadership of former Governor Donald Duke. The cancellation of the 25-year concession agreement, which was initially granted under the administration of Senator Ben Ayade, also highlights the difficulties in ensuring successful public-private partnerships, particularly when one party does not fulfill its contractual duties.

The governor’s directive to key stakeholders, including Sunday Michael, the Special Adviser and CEO of Obudu Ranch Resort, to implement measures to revamp the facility suggests a renewed commitment to revitalize the tourism sector and make the ranch a major attraction once again.

This decision also brings to the forefront the broader challenges faced by the tourism sector in Cross River, which had seen significant decline after the peak of the Donald Duke administration. Restoring the Obudu Cattle Ranch to its former status would require a comprehensive plan, involving both public and private sector involvement, with a focus on upgrading infrastructure and marketing the location as a top-tier destination.

What do you think about the decision to terminate the agreement? Do you believe this move could lead to the revitalization of the Obudu Cattle Ranch, or is there a risk of further deterioration without a solid plan in place?

The Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions’ decision to reject calls for live television coverage of the proceedings against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan highlights the delicate nature of the ongoing investigation. While Akpoti-Uduaghan had requested live coverage to ensure transparency, the committee’s rationale for denying the request focuses on avoiding distractions and maintaining the focus on the core issue without turning the matter into a media spectacle.

Senator Neda Imasuen’s explanation about the limited space in the committee room and the need for an uninterrupted focus on the matter before them adds a pragmatic aspect to their decision. There’s also the concern that broadcasting proceedings could shift the focus away from the substantive issues and become more about media attention.

Despite the rejection of live coverage, the assurance that Akpoti-Uduaghan will receive a fair hearing and that her rights will be protected should reassure her supporters. Imasuen’s statement about his commitment to ensuring a fair process is crucial, especially considering the tensions surrounding Akpoti-Uduaghan’s clash with Senate President Godswill Akpabio and the allegations of sexual misconduct that have further complicated the situation.

Imasuen’s refusal to comment on the sexual misconduct issue due to legal constraints is also a careful stance, as the matter is still before the courts, and commenting could be seen as interfering with legal proceedings.

This development adds another layer to the unfolding political drama, and it will be interesting to see how the committee handles the matter without the added pressure of public scrutiny through live media coverage. How do you feel about the decision to reject live coverage? Do you think this will help keep the focus on the issue at hand, or could it fuel further public speculation?

The praise from the United States Bureau of Counterterrorism for the Nigerian Air Force (NAF) marks a significant acknowledgment of the NAF’s role in combating terrorism and insurgency in Nigeria. It highlights the successful counterterrorism efforts and the adoption of innovative, intelligence-driven tactics that have helped to disrupt terrorist networks in the country. This recognition also underscores the importance of strategic military collaboration between nations in the fight against terrorism.

Jessica Long’s commendation of the NAF’s approach emphasizes the growing need for adaptable and targeted military operations, which are key in tackling evolving security threats in the region. The NAF’s commitment to national security and the protection of civilians is also a notable aspect of this partnership, showcasing a balance between offensive operations and humanitarian considerations.

Furthermore, the meeting between Nigerian and US officials reinforces the importance of international collaboration, particularly in intelligence sharing and security cooperation. With both countries working together to strengthen counterterrorism strategies, the hope is that there will be even more precision in military operations and more effective counterterrorism initiatives in the future.

This collaboration could be a vital factor in further weakening the insurgency and improving security in Nigeria. It also sets a strong example of how global partnerships can help address shared challenges, particularly in regions grappling with terrorism and insurgency.

What do you think about the level of collaboration between the US and Nigeria in counterterrorism efforts? How do you think this partnership might impact the overall security situation in Nigeria in the long term?

The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) has delivered a powerful and timely message as the Lenten season begins, emphasizing hope, reflection, and community in the face of the nation’s struggles. Archbishop Daniel Okoh’s statement highlights how, despite the challenges Nigeria is facing—rising living costs, insecurity, and everyday hardships—Lent can offer a period of spiritual renewal and a reminder of the power of faith.

The call for Nigerians to reflect on what truly matters during this time and to make sacrifices, pray, and engage in charity is especially poignant. By acknowledging the challenges faced by people across different sectors—whether they are traders, farmers, teachers, or students—CAN connects with everyday Nigerians and emphasizes the collective strength found in faith and community.

The focus on forgiveness, unity, and selflessness during this 40-day period could be seen as an invitation to put aside bitterness and focus on building a more compassionate society. The reminder that Nigerians are united under God, despite their differences, provides a sense of shared responsibility to work toward a better future for the country.

This message calls for solidarity, urging both Christians and non-Christians alike to join in the spirit of renewal and prayer for the nation, its leaders, and its youth. It’s a timely call for peace and unity, especially as the country continues to face political, economic, and social challenges.

How do you think this message will resonate with Nigerians, especially given the current challenges? Could this be a turning point for collective action, or do you think the struggles might overshadow the call for renewal?

Germany’s decision to halt new development aid to Rwanda and review existing commitments is a significant move, and it underscores the tension surrounding Rwanda’s role in the ongoing conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The accusation that Rwanda is supporting the M23 rebel group has raised concerns among Western powers, the United Nations, and Congo, while Rwanda continues to deny the allegations and justifies its actions based on self-defense.

Rwanda’s response, calling Germany’s actions “wrong and counterproductive,” highlights the sensitivities surrounding the region’s history and the complex dynamics of the conflict. The mention of Germany’s historical responsibility for the instability in the region adds a layer of complexity to the diplomatic discourse. Rwanda’s foreign ministry suggests that unilateral actions could worsen the situation rather than resolve it.

The situation is further compounded by the ongoing violence in eastern Congo, with the M23 group controlling significant territories and valuable resources. The historical context, particularly the aftermath of Rwanda’s 1994 genocide, plays a crucial role in the region’s geopolitics, adding urgency to finding a diplomatic solution.

Germany’s stance could impact future relations and aid strategies with Rwanda, but it will likely depend on whether Rwanda adjusts its position regarding the M23 or finds a way to address the concerns raised by the international community.

What do you think of Germany’s response? Do you believe it will lead to any positive changes in the situation, or might it escalate tensions further?

On Tuesday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky proposed a course of action that he believes could bring an end to the war in Ukraine, while also attempting to reassure the Trump administration of his commitment to peace. Zelensky’s remarks followed a tense meeting at the White House the previous week, during which President Trump criticized Zelensky, calling him ungrateful. This was followed by Trump’s announcement that he was suspending all U.S. military aid to Ukraine.

Zelensky wrote on X (formerly Twitter) that the meeting had not gone as expected, expressing regret over how things transpired and emphasizing the need to make things right. He suggested a potential path to peace, offering to release Russian prisoners of war, halt long-range drone and missile strikes aimed at Russian targets, and declare an immediate truce at sea — all steps he said would help pave the way for peace. However, he made it clear that these actions would only be taken “if Russia will do the same.”

In his speech to Congress on Tuesday night, Trump acknowledged Zelensky’s willingness to negotiate and mentioned a potential revenue-sharing minerals deal with the United States. Trump also emphasized the importance of talking to both sides in a conflict to end wars, citing ongoing discussions with Russia and strong signals that they are ready for peace.

Zelensky’s proposal appears to place the responsibility for ending the war on Russia, which launched its invasion three years ago. The White House has previously claimed that Zelensky is the main obstacle to peace. Despite this, Zelensky expressed gratitude for American support, particularly noting when President Trump provided Ukraine with Javelin anti-tank missiles, which marked a turning point in their relationship.

Zelensky’s message also reiterated Ukraine’s readiness to negotiate, offering to work under President Trump’s leadership to achieve a lasting peace.

Supporters of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central Senatorial District, were dispersed by operatives of the Nigeria Police Force as they attempted to access the National Assembly Complex. The protesters had gathered at the assembly gate early on Tuesday, coinciding with the resumption of Senate plenary and the scheduled hearing of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions.

Police officers used tear gas to disperse the crowd, citing concerns over potential disorder. Following the dispersal, the protesters moved to Unity Fountain in Abuja to continue their demonstration.

The protest is linked to rising tensions following a public altercation on February 20, 2025, between Akpoti-Uduaghan and Senate President Godswill Akpabio over seat allocation in the Senate chamber. This clash led to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s referral to the Senate’s ethics committee for disciplinary review.

Additionally, the situation escalated last Friday when Akpoti-Uduaghan accused Akpabio of sexual harassment, claiming she was being targeted after rejecting his advances. This serious allegation has further intensified public attention on the matter.

The situation remains fluid, and more updates are expected.